The Design for Diversity Learning Toolkit
☰
  • What Is This?
  • Using the Toolkit
    • Overview
    • For Practitioners
    • For Teachers
    • Finding Full Text
  •   Case Studies
  •   Study Paths
  •   Topic
    • Algorithmic Bias
    • Collecting Materials
    • Curation and Remix
    • Intellectual and Cultural Property
    • Metadata and Nomenclature
    • Process and Partnerships
    • Technical Design
    • User Experience
  • Community of Focus
    • African American and Black Communities
    • Asian American Communities
    • Indigenous Communities
    • Latinx Communities
    • LGBTQ Communities
    • People with Disabilities
    • Women
  • Format
    • Case Study
    • Community of Practice
    • Model Project
    • Reading or Video
    • Study Path
  •   About Design for Diversity
    • Project Team
    • Contact
  • Home
  • Any Format
  • Reading or Video
  • The (De-)Universalization of the United States: Inscribing Maori History in the Library of Congress Classification
Reading or Video 

The (De-)Universalization of the United States: Inscribing Maori History in the Library of Congress Classification

Metadata and Nomenclature
 
Published  August 17, 2018  

This chapter demonstrates how the University of Waikato in New Zealand adapted a global standard (the Library of Congress Classification) for local use by inscribing topics related to and about Māori history and people.

The University of Waikato’s classification simultaneously uses and implicitly critiques a universal system written from a U.S. vantage point. It seems to acknowledge the benefits and necessities of using a globally recognized standard, as well as a need to inscribe local, anticolonial perspectives into that system.

1341761 {1341761:PZTXV8GK} 1 chicago-author-date 50 default 531 https://des4div.library.northeastern.edu/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22PZTXV8GK%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1341761%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Adler%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222017-07-20%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EAdler%2C%20Melissa.%202017.%20%26%23x201C%3BThe%20%28De-%29Universalization%20of%20the%20United%20States%3A%20Inscribing%20Maori%20History%20in%20the%20Library%20of%20Congress%20Classification.%26%23x201D%3B%20In%20%3Ci%3EThe%20Organization%20of%20Knowledge%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2C%2012%3A33%26%23x2013%3B50.%20Studies%20in%20Information%2012.%20Emerald%20Publishing%20Limited.%20https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1108%5C%2FS2055-537720170000011009.%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22bookSection%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22The%20%28De-%29Universalization%20of%20the%20United%20States%3A%20Inscribing%20Maori%20History%20in%20the%20Library%20of%20Congress%20Classification%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Melissa%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Adler%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22This%20chapter%20demonstrates%20how%20the%20University%20of%20Waikato%20in%20New%20Zealand%20adapted%20a%20global%20standard%20%28the%20Library%20of%20Congress%20Classification%29%20for%20local%20use%20by%20inscribing%20topics%20related%20to%20and%20about%20M%5Cu0101ori%20history%20and%20people.%5Cn%5CnThe%20findings%20are%20the%20result%20of%20using%20library%20catalogs%20and%20classifications%20as%20primary%20historical%20documents.%5Cn%5CnThe%20University%20of%20Waikato%5Cu2019s%20classification%20simultaneously%20uses%20and%20implicitly%20critiques%20a%20universal%20system%20written%20from%20a%20U.S.%20vantage%20point.%20It%20seems%20to%20acknowledge%20the%20benefits%20and%20necessities%20of%20using%20a%20globally%20recognized%20standard%2C%20as%20well%20as%20a%20need%20to%20inscribe%20local%2C%20anticolonial%20perspectives%20into%20that%20system.%5Cn%5CnThe%20research%20relies%20on%20historical%20documents%2C%20and%20some%20aspects%20related%20to%20purpose%20and%20attribution%20are%20difficult%20to%20ascertain.%5Cn%5CnThe%20local%20adaptation%20of%20the%20Library%20of%20Congress%20Classification%20may%20serve%20as%20a%20model%20for%20other%20local%20adaptations.%5Cn%5CnThis%20may%20bring%20new%20dimensions%20to%20thinking%20about%20colonialism%20and%20anticolonialism%20in%20knowledge%20organization%20systems.%20It%20contributes%20to%20ongoing%20conversations%20regarding%20indigenous%20knowledge%20organization%20practices.%5Cn%5CnAlthough%20scholars%20have%20examined%20M%5Cu0101ori%20subject%20headings%2C%20research%20on%20local%20shelf%20classifications%20in%20New%20Zealand%20have%20not%20been%20objects%20of%20study%20in%20the%20context%20of%20global%20and%20local%20knowledge%20organization.%20This%20chapter%20brings%20an%20important%20classification%20to%20light.%22%2C%22bookTitle%22%3A%22The%20Organization%20of%20Knowledge%22%2C%22date%22%3A%22July%2020%2C%202017%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISBN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.emeraldinsight.com%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2Fabs%5C%2F10.1108%5C%2FS2055-537720170000011009%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222018-09-27T10%3A59%3A16Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Adler, Melissa. 2017. “The (De-)Universalization of the United States: Inscribing Maori History in the Library of Congress Classification.” In The Organization of Knowledge, 12:33–50. Studies in Information 12. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-537720170000011009.
Published  August 17, 2018  

Post navigation

Previous Post« Previous “To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing”: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives
Next Post Dismantling The Ivory Tower: A How-To Guide for POC Charting New Strategies for Social Justice OrganizingNext »
Narrow Down
  • By Topic

  • By Community of Focus

  • By Format

Get Help
  • Read an introduction to the Toolkit including definitions for formats and topics
  • Use the Toolkit in the classroom or workplace
  • Find full text of books or journals used in the Toolkit
Participate
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our email list
  • Review the Toolkit website and tell us what you think
Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise indicated, content on Design for Diversity (2016-2019) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 
  This project is made possible in part by the Institute of Museum and Library Services [LG-73-16-0126-16]. The views, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed here do not necessarily represent those of the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
×Close