The Design for Diversity Learning Toolkit
☰
  • What Is This?
  • Using the Toolkit
    • Overview
    • For Practitioners
    • For Teachers
    • Finding Full Text
  •   Case Studies
  •   Study Paths
  •   Topic
    • Algorithmic Bias
    • Collecting Materials
    • Curation and Remix
    • Intellectual and Cultural Property
    • Metadata and Nomenclature
    • Process and Partnerships
    • Technical Design
    • User Experience
  • Community of Focus
    • African American and Black Communities
    • Asian American Communities
    • Indigenous Communities
    • Latinx Communities
    • LGBTQ Communities
    • People with Disabilities
    • Women
  • Format
    • Case Study
    • Community of Practice
    • Model Project
    • Reading or Video
    • Study Path
  •   About Design for Diversity
    • Project Team
    • Contact
  • Home
  • Any Format
  • Reading or Video
  • What’s Gender Got to Do with It? A Critique of RDA 9.7 / Amber Billey, Emily Drabinski, and K. R. Roberto
Reading or Video 

What’s Gender Got to Do with It? A Critique of RDA 9.7 / Amber Billey, Emily Drabinski, and K. R. Roberto

Metadata and Nomenclature
 
Published  May 11, 2018  

The RDA catalogues gender according to the male/female binary. The authors argue for a removal of gender cataloguing, especially when the controlled vocabulary falls into this binary; part of the problem with labeling gender is the choices are based on physical and name markers. This cataloging which reinforces problematic notions of gender as stable and legible. One potential loss for not cataloguing gender identity is losing the ability to group people by gender. The authors, however, argue that researching groups by gender continues to privilege the gender binary, instead of representing queer identities. Being aware of the complex and fluid nature of gender identities contradicts the need to catalogue gender.

1341761 {1341761:XQ73U5AS} 1 chicago-author-date 50 default 142 https://des4div.library.northeastern.edu/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22XQ73U5AS%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1341761%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22lastModifiedByUser%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A5152727%2C%22username%22%3A%22mlclear%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22%22%2C%22links%22%3A%7B%22alternate%22%3A%7B%22href%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.zotero.org%5C%2Fmlclear%22%2C%22type%22%3A%22text%5C%2Fhtml%22%7D%7D%7D%2C%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Billey%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222014%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A2%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EBilley%2C%20Amber%2C%20Emily%20Drabinski%2C%20and%20K.%20R.%20Roberto.%202014.%20%26%23x201C%3BWhat%26%23x2019%3Bs%20Gender%20Got%20to%20Do%20with%20It%3F%20A%20Critique%20of%20RDA%209.7.%26%23x201D%3B%20%3Ci%3ECataloging%20%26amp%3B%20Classification%20Quarterly%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2052%20%284%29%3A%20412%26%23x2013%3B21.%20%3Ca%20class%3D%27zp-ItemURL%27%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2Fabs%5C%2F10.1080%5C%2F01639374.2014.882465%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2Fabs%5C%2F10.1080%5C%2F01639374.2014.882465%3C%5C%2Fa%3E.%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22What%5Cu2019s%20Gender%20Got%20to%20Do%20with%20It%3F%20A%20Critique%20of%20RDA%209.7.%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Amber%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Billey%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Emily%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Drabinski%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22K.%20R.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Roberto%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22The%20Library%20of%20Congress%20%28LC%29%20and%20the%20Program%20for%20Cooperative%20Cataloging%20%28PCC%29%20interpretation%20of%20Resource%20Description%20and%20Access%20%28RDA%29%209.7%20regarding%20gender%20when%20identifying%20persons%20reinforces%20regressive%20conceptions%20of%20gender%20identity.%20The%20rule%20instructs%20catalogers%20to%20record%20gender%20when%20identifying%20persons%2C%20and%20although%20RDA%20gives%20catalogers%20the%20flexibility%20to%20record%20more%20than%20two%20gender%20labels%2C%20LC%20limits%20Name%20Authority%20Cooperative%20Program%20%28NACO%29%20catalogers%20to%20a%20binary%20label%3A%20male%2C%20female%2C%20or%20not%20known.%20In%20this%20article%2C%20the%20authors%20challenge%20gender%20as%20a%20descriptive%20attribute%20for%20personal%20names%2C%20critique%20how%20LC%20is%20instructing%20NACO%20catalogers%20to%20record%20elements%20about%20gender%2C%20and%20make%20recommendations%20to%20address%20describing%20persons%20in%20LC%20authority%20records.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222014%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2Fabs%5C%2F10.1080%5C%2F01639374.2014.882465%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222019-02-04T01%3A23%3A19Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Billey, Amber, Emily Drabinski, and K. R. Roberto. 2014. “What’s Gender Got to Do with It? A Critique of RDA 9.7.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 52 (4): 412–21. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01639374.2014.882465.
Published  May 11, 2018  

Post navigation

Previous Post« Previous Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design / Shaowen Bardzell
Next Post Feminism and the Future of Library Discovery / Bess Sadler and Chris BourgNext »
Narrow Down
  • By Topic

  • By Community of Focus

  • By Format

Get Help
  • Read an introduction to the Toolkit including definitions for formats and topics
  • Use the Toolkit in the classroom or workplace
  • Find full text of books or journals used in the Toolkit
Participate
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our email list
  • Review the Toolkit website and tell us what you think
Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise indicated, content on Design for Diversity (2016-2019) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 
  This project is made possible in part by the Institute of Museum and Library Services [LG-73-16-0126-16]. The views, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed here do not necessarily represent those of the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
×Close