The RDA catalogues gender according to the male/female binary. The authors argue for a removal of gender cataloguing, especially when the controlled vocabulary falls into this binary; part of the problem with labeling gender is the choices are based on physical and name markers. This cataloging which reinforces problematic notions of gender as stable and legible. One potential loss for not cataloguing gender identity is losing the ability to group people by gender. The authors, however, argue that researching groups by gender continues to privilege the gender binary, instead of representing queer identities. Being aware of the complex and fluid nature of gender identities contradicts the need to catalogue gender.
1341761
{1341761:XQ73U5AS}
1
chicago-author-date
50
default
142
https://des4div.library.northeastern.edu/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22XQ73U5AS%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1341761%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22lastModifiedByUser%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A5152727%2C%22username%22%3A%22mlclear%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22%22%2C%22links%22%3A%7B%22alternate%22%3A%7B%22href%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.zotero.org%5C%2Fmlclear%22%2C%22type%22%3A%22text%5C%2Fhtml%22%7D%7D%7D%2C%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Billey%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222014%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A2%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EBilley%2C%20Amber%2C%20Emily%20Drabinski%2C%20and%20K.%20R.%20Roberto.%202014.%20%26%23x201C%3BWhat%26%23x2019%3Bs%20Gender%20Got%20to%20Do%20with%20It%3F%20A%20Critique%20of%20RDA%209.7.%26%23x201D%3B%20%3Ci%3ECataloging%20%26amp%3B%20Classification%20Quarterly%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2052%20%284%29%3A%20412%26%23x2013%3B21.%20%3Ca%20class%3D%27zp-ItemURL%27%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2Fabs%5C%2F10.1080%5C%2F01639374.2014.882465%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2Fabs%5C%2F10.1080%5C%2F01639374.2014.882465%3C%5C%2Fa%3E.%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22What%5Cu2019s%20Gender%20Got%20to%20Do%20with%20It%3F%20A%20Critique%20of%20RDA%209.7.%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Amber%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Billey%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Emily%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Drabinski%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22K.%20R.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Roberto%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22The%20Library%20of%20Congress%20%28LC%29%20and%20the%20Program%20for%20Cooperative%20Cataloging%20%28PCC%29%20interpretation%20of%20Resource%20Description%20and%20Access%20%28RDA%29%209.7%20regarding%20gender%20when%20identifying%20persons%20reinforces%20regressive%20conceptions%20of%20gender%20identity.%20The%20rule%20instructs%20catalogers%20to%20record%20gender%20when%20identifying%20persons%2C%20and%20although%20RDA%20gives%20catalogers%20the%20flexibility%20to%20record%20more%20than%20two%20gender%20labels%2C%20LC%20limits%20Name%20Authority%20Cooperative%20Program%20%28NACO%29%20catalogers%20to%20a%20binary%20label%3A%20male%2C%20female%2C%20or%20not%20known.%20In%20this%20article%2C%20the%20authors%20challenge%20gender%20as%20a%20descriptive%20attribute%20for%20personal%20names%2C%20critique%20how%20LC%20is%20instructing%20NACO%20catalogers%20to%20record%20elements%20about%20gender%2C%20and%20make%20recommendations%20to%20address%20describing%20persons%20in%20LC%20authority%20records.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222014%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2Fabs%5C%2F10.1080%5C%2F01639374.2014.882465%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222019-02-04T01%3A23%3A19Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Billey, Amber, Emily Drabinski, and K. R. Roberto. 2014. “What’s Gender Got to Do with It? A Critique of RDA 9.7.”
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 52 (4): 412–21.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01639374.2014.882465.